受害者声援加害者？上海宝山数千投资者围堵公安局（2025.12.17）

「受害者声援加害者？上海宝山数千投资者围堵公安局（2025.12.17）」12月17日上午，上海市宝山区铁通路，上海市公安局宝山分局经侦支队门前，被数千名情绪激动的艾兴合投资者堵得水泄不通，人群中，不仅响起整齐的“放人”口号，还有大量写有还我董事长，企业正常运营”等口号的标语，以及印满红手印的联名信。投资者们的诉求很明确：要求释放此前因涉嫌非法集资被捕的惜艾集团董事长吴凤勤。直至当天深夜，仍有大批投资者聚集在宝山公安分局经侦支队门口。这极具讽刺意味的一幕，难道是投资者斯德哥尔摩综合症附体吗？

曾经因财务贪污受党内警告的中共党员吴凤勤，在2017年创办“上海惜艾健康科技集团”后，将自己包装成“政协委员背景”“女性创业导师”“助农先锋”，赢得大量中老年人的信任。2023年，吴凤勤借助“数字经济”“乡村振兴”等热门概念，推出艾兴合商城，并在2024年起直至2025年11月爆雷期间，通过“艾兴合”“艾兴优选”“互助抢拍商城”等APP，以日收益1%-1.27%、年化365%-466%的超高转化率，迅速骗取了上百亿资金。

自2025年11月爆雷后至今，投资者们迅速在浙江、上海等地发起多次讨款行动，他们的诉求，竟也在此期间发生了180度的转变，从11月的“严惩诈骗犯”，到12月吴凤勤被抓之后变为“释放大爱董事长”。这样的转变并非投资者真心相信吴凤勤是“大爱董事长”，而是源于他们对公安和法律的绝望，他们不相信警察能帮他们拿回投资款。历史案例也无数次证明了这一点：中植

「受害者声援加害者？上海宝山数千投资者围堵公安局（2025.12.17）」12月17日上午，上海市宝山区铁通路，上海市公安局宝山分局经侦支队门前，被数千名情绪激动的艾兴合投资者堵得水泄不通，人群中，不仅响起整齐的“放人”口号，还有大量写有还我董事长，企业正常运营”等口号的标语，以及印满红手印的联名信。投资者们的诉求很明确：要求释放此前因涉嫌非法集资被捕的惜艾集团董事长吴凤勤。直至当天深夜，仍有大批投资者聚集在宝山公安分局经侦支队门口。这极具讽刺意味的一幕，难道是投资者斯德哥尔摩综合症附体吗？

曾经因财务贪污受党内警告的中共党员吴凤勤，在2017年创办“上海惜艾健康科技集团”后，将自己包装成“政协委员背景”“女性创业导师”“助农先锋”，赢得大量中老年人的信任。2023年，吴凤勤借助“数字经济”“乡村振兴”等热门概念，推出艾兴合商城，并在2024年起直至2025年11月爆雷期间，通过“艾兴合”“艾兴优选”“互助抢拍商城”等APP，以日收益1%-1.27%、年化365%-466%的超高转化率，迅速骗取了上百亿资金。

自2025年11月爆雷后至今，投资者们迅速在浙江、上海等地发起多次讨款行动，他们的诉求，竟也在此期间发生了180度的转变，从11月的“严惩诈骗犯”，到12月吴凤勤被抓之后变为“释放大爱董事长”。这样的转变并非投资者真心相信吴凤勤是“大爱董事长”，而是源于他们对公安和法律的绝望，他们不相信警察能帮他们拿回投资款。历史案例也无数次证明了这一点：中植系、鼎益丰、永倍达、树拍等大批案例均显示，一旦进入法律程序，投资就几乎无法追回；海汇国际案例甚至出现公安长期将扣押资金据为己有、故意拖延办案的情况。因此，投资者才不惜以受害者身份声援加害者，孤注一掷地希望吴凤勤从监狱出来后能够返还他们的资金。

对他们来说，钱在吴凤勤手里，就还有一线希望，要是到了公安手里，就意味着彻底无望。

Victims Rally Behind the Perpetrator? Thousands of Investors Besiege a Police Station in Baoshan, Shanghai (2025.12.17)

On the morning of December 17, on Tietong Road in Baoshan District, Shanghai, the entrance to the Economic Crimes Investigation Division of the Baoshan Branch of the Shanghai Municipal Public Security Bureau was completely blocked by thousands of emotionally charged Aixinghe investors. In the crowd, not only were synchronized chants of “Release him” heard, but there were also large numbers of banners bearing slogans such as “Give Us Back Our Chairman” and “Let the Company Operate Normally,” as well as a joint petition covered in red handprints. The investors’ demands were clear: they called for the release of Wu Fengqin, chairman of the Xi’ai Group, who had previously been arrested on suspicion of illegal fundraising. Even late into the night, large numbers of investors were still gathered outside the Economic Crimes Investigation Division of the Baoshan police. This deeply ironic scene raises an unsettling question: are these investors afflicted by a form of Stockholm syndrome?

Wu Fengqin, a Chinese Communist Party member who had once received an internal party warning for financial embezzlement, founded “Shanghai Xi’ai Health Technology Group” in 2017. She carefully packaged herself as someone with a “CPPCC background,” a “female entrepreneurship mentor,” and a “pioneer in supporting agriculture,” winning the trust of large numbers of middle-aged and elderly people. In 2023, capitalizing on buzzwords such as the “digital economy” and “rural revitalization,” Wu launched the Aixinghe Mall. From 2024 until the scheme collapsed in November 2025, she used apps such as “Aixinghe,” “Aixing Preferred,” and “Mutual Aid Flash Auction Mall,” promising daily returns of 1%–1.27% and annualized returns of 365%–466%, to rapidly swindle hundreds of billions of yuan.

Since the collapse in November 2025, investors have quickly launched multiple efforts to recover their money in Zhejiang, Shanghai, and elsewhere. During this period, their demands underwent a dramatic 180-degree shift—from calling for the “severe punishment of the fraudster” in November, to demanding the “release of the benevolent chairman” after Wu Fengqin was arrested in December. This change does not mean that investors genuinely believe Wu Fengqin to be a “benevolent chairman.” Rather, it stems from their despair toward the police and the legal system. They do not believe the police can help them recover their investments. Countless past cases have proven this point: cases involving the Zhongzhi Group, Dingyifeng, Yongbeida, Shupai, and many others show that once a case enters legal proceedings, investments are almost impossible to recover. In the Haihui International case, there were even situations in which the police allegedly held seized funds for long periods and deliberately delayed handling the case. It is for this reason that investors, despite being victims, have chosen to rally behind the perpetrator, making a desperate all-or-nothing gamble in the hope that Wu Fengqin, once released from prison, might return their money.

For them, as long as the money remains in Wu Fengqin’s hands, there is still a sliver of hope; once it falls into the hands of the police, it means total despair.